Data-Engineer-Associate模擬試験 & Data-Engineer-Associateトレーニング費用

Tags: Data-Engineer-Associate模擬試験, Data-Engineer-Associateトレーニング費用, Data-Engineer-Associate参考書内容, Data-Engineer-Associate合格資料, Data-Engineer-Associate問題集無料

無料でクラウドストレージから最新のCertJuken Data-Engineer-Associate PDFダンプをダウンロードする：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1aixICd2GA7_q-4fxTSFYNJV-ykKyQWlo

専門的な学習資料なしでData-Engineer-Associate試験の準備をするのは時間がかかり、疲れる場合があります。そのため、Data-Engineer-Associate学習ツールを学習パートナーとして選択するのが最善の決断です。また、Data-Engineer-Associate学習ツールは、多数の受験者に実際の試験に関するより良い視点を提供します。 Data-Engineer-Associateの最新の練習資料の研究に特化してきた今、私たちは無限の努力で多数の顧客を処理し、Data-Engineer-Associate試験ガイドがあなたの満足に浸透すると信じています。

私たちは常に新しい知識を習得していますが、常に忘れられているプロセスであり、この問題を解決する方法を常に忘れてしまいます。答えは良い記憶方法を持つことです。Data-Engineer-Associate試験問題はうまくいきます。この点について。 Data-Engineer-Associateの実際の試験教材には独自の学習方法があり、従来の暗記学習を放棄し、テキストとグラフィックスの記憶方法の組み合わせなど、多様な記憶パターンを採用して、知識の記憶を区別します。 Data-Engineer-Associate学習リファレンスファイルは非常に科学的で合理的であるため、安全に購入できます。

>> Data-Engineer-Associate模擬試験 <<

Data-Engineer-Associateトレーニング費用 & Data-Engineer-Associate参考書内容

CertJukenで、あなたは一番良い準備資料を見つけられます。その資料は練習問題と解答に含まれています。弊社のData-Engineer-Associate対策があなたに練習を実践に移すチャンスを差し上げ、あなたはぜひAmazonのData-Engineer-Associateに合格して自分の目標を達成できます。同時に、あなたを安心させるように、我々は様々なことを承諾しています。我々は一番全面的なアフターサービスを提供して、あなたの心配することを解決します。

Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) 認定 Data-Engineer-Associate 試験問題 (Q61-Q66):

質問 # 61
A financial company wants to use Amazon Athena to run on-demand SQL queries on a petabyte-scale dataset to support a business intelligence (BI) application. An AWS Glue job that runs during non-business hours updates the dataset once every day. The BI application has a standard data refresh frequency of 1 hour to comply with company policies.
A data engineer wants to cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena without adding any additional infrastructure costs.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

A. Configure an Amazon S3 Lifecycle policy to move data to the S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage class after 1 day
B. Change the format of the files that are in the dataset to Apache Parquet.
C. Add an Amazon ElastiCache cluster between the Bl application and Athena.
D. Use the query result reuse feature of Amazon Athena for the SQL queries.

正解：D

解説：
The best solution to cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena without adding any additional infrastructure costs is to use the query result reuse feature of AmazonAthena for the SQL queries. This feature allows you to run the same query multiple times without incurring additional charges, as long as the underlying data has not changed and the query results are still in the query result location in Amazon S31. This feature is useful for scenarios where you have a petabyte-scale dataset that is updated infrequently, such as once a day, and you have a BI application that runs the same queries repeatedly, such as every hour. By using the query result reuse feature, you can reduce the amount of data scanned by your queries and save on the cost of running Athena. You can enable or disable this feature at the workgroup level or at the individual query level1.
Option A is not the best solution, as configuring an Amazon S3 Lifecycle policy to move data to the S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage class after 1 day would not cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena, but rather increase the cost and complexity. Amazon S3 Lifecycle policies are rules that you can define to automatically transition objects between different storage classes based on specified criteria, such as the age of the object2. S3 Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class in Amazon S3, designed for long-term data archiving that is accessed once or twice in a year3. While moving data to S3 Glacier Deep Archive can reduce the storage cost, it would also increase the retrieval cost and latency, as it takes up to 12 hours to restore the data from S3 Glacier Deep Archive3. Moreover, Athena does not support querying data that is in S3 Glacier or S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage classes4. Therefore, using this option would not meet the requirements of running on-demand SQL queries on the dataset.
Option C is not the best solution, as adding an Amazon ElastiCache cluster between the BI application and Athena would not cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena, but rather increase the cost and complexity. Amazon ElastiCache is a service that offers fully managed in-memory data stores, such as Redis and Memcached, that can improve the performance and scalability of web applications by caching frequently accessed data. While using ElastiCache can reduce the latency and load on the BI application, it would not reduce the amount of data scanned by Athena, which is the main factor that determines the cost of running Athena. Moreover, using ElastiCache would introduce additional infrastructure costs and operational overhead, as you would have to provision, manage, and scale the ElastiCache cluster, and integrate it with the BI application and Athena.
Option D is not the best solution, as changing the format of the files that are in the dataset to Apache Parquet would not cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena without adding any additional infrastructure costs, but rather increase the complexity. Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that can improve the performance of analytical queries by reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned and providing efficient compression and encoding schemes. However,changing the format of the files that are in the dataset to Apache Parquet would require additional processing and transformation steps, such as using AWS Glue or Amazon EMR to convert the files from their original format to Parquet, and storing the converted files in a separate location in Amazon S3. This would increase the complexity and the operational overhead of the data pipeline, and also incur additional costs for using AWS Glue or Amazon EMR. References:
Query result reuse
Amazon S3 Lifecycle
S3 Glacier Deep Archive
Storage classes supported by Athena
[What is Amazon ElastiCache?]
[Amazon Athena pricing]
[Columnar Storage Formats]
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

質問 # 62
A company currently stores all of its data in Amazon S3 by using the S3 Standard storage class.
A data engineer examined data access patterns to identify trends. During the first 6 months, most data files are accessed several times each day. Between 6 months and 2 years, most data files are accessed once or twice each month. After 2 years, data files are accessed only once or twice each year.
The data engineer needs to use an S3 Lifecycle policy to develop new data storage rules. The new storage solution must continue to provide high availability.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?

A. Transition objects to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) after 6 months. Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 2 years.
B. Transition objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 6 months. Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 2 years.
C. Transition objects to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) after 6 months. Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years.
D. Transition objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 6 months. Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years.

正解：B

解説：
To achieve the most cost-effective storage solution, the data engineer needs to use an S3 Lifecycle policy that transitions objects to lower-cost storage classes based on their access patterns, and deletes them when they are no longer needed. The storage classes should also provide high availability, which means they should be resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, the solution must include the following steps:
Transition objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 6 months. S3 Standard-IA is designed for data that is accessed less frequently, but requires rapid access when needed. It offers the same high durability, throughput, and low latency as S3 Standard, but with a lower storage cost and a retrieval fee2. Therefore, it is suitablefor data files that are accessed once or twice each month. S3 Standard-IA also provides high availability, as it stores data redundantly across multiple Availability Zones1.
Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 2 years. S3 Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is rarely accessed and can tolerate a
12-hour retrieval time. It is ideal for long-term archiving and digital preservation3. Therefore, it is suitable for data files that are accessed only once or twice each year. S3 Glacier Deep Archive also provides high availability, as it stores data across at least three geographically dispersed Availability Zones1.
Delete objects when they are no longer needed. The data engineer can specify an expiration action in the S3 Lifecycle policy to delete objects after a certain period of time. This will reduce the storage cost and comply with any data retention policies.
Option C is the only solution that includes all these steps. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.
Option A is incorrect because it transitions objects to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) after
6 months. S3 One Zone-IA is similar to S3 Standard-IA, but it stores data in a single Availability Zone. This means it has a lower availability and durability than S3 Standard-IA, and it is not resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, it does not provide high availability as required.
Option B is incorrect because it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years. S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is a storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is accessed infrequently and can tolerate a retrieval time of minutes to hours. It is more expensive than S3 Glacier Deep Archive, and it is not suitable for data that is accessed only once or twice each year3. Therefore, it is not the most cost-effective option.
Option D is incorrect because it combines the errors of option A and B. It transitions objects to S3 One Zone-IA after 6 months, which does not provide high availability, and it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years, which is not the most cost-effective option.
References:
1: Amazon S3 storage classes - Amazon Simple Storage Service
2: Amazon S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) - Amazon Simple Storage Service
3: Amazon S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[4]: Expiring objects - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[5]: Managing your storage lifecycle - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[6]: Examples of S3 Lifecycle configuration - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[7]: Amazon S3 Lifecycle further optimizes storage cost savings with new features - What's New with AWS

質問 # 63
A data engineer needs to use AWS Step Functions to design an orchestration workflow. The workflow must parallel process a large collection of data files and apply a specific transformation to each file.
Which Step Functions state should the data engineer use to meet these requirements?

A. Parallel state
B. Choice state
C. Map state
D. Wait state

正解：C

解説：
Option C is the correct answer because the Map state is designed to process a collection of data in parallel by applying the same transformation to each element. The Map state can invoke a nested workflow for each element, which can be another state machine ora Lambda function. The Map state will wait until all the parallel executions are completed before moving to the next state.
Option A is incorrect because the Parallel state is used to execute multiple branches of logic concurrently, not to process a collection of data. The Parallel state can have different branches with different logic and states, whereas the Map state has only one branch that is applied to each element of the collection.
Option B is incorrect because the Choice state is used to make decisions based on a comparison of a value to a set of rules. The Choice state does not process any data or invoke any nested workflows.
Option D is incorrect because the Wait state is used to delay the state machine from continuing for a specified time. The Wait state does not process any data or invoke any nested workflows.
References:
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 5: Data Orchestration, Section 5.3: AWS Step Functions, Pages 131-132 Building Batch Data Analytics Solutions on AWS, Module 5: Data Orchestration, Lesson 5.2: AWS Step Functions, Pages 9-10 AWS Documentation Overview, AWS Step Functions Developer Guide, Step Functions Concepts, State Types, Map State, Pages 1-3

質問 # 64
A data engineer must ingest a source of structured data that is in .csv format into an Amazon S3 data lake. The
.csv files contain 15 columns. Data analysts need to run Amazon Athena queries on one or two columns of the dataset. The data analysts rarely query the entire file.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

A. Create an AWS Glue extract, transform, and load (ETL) job to read from the .csv structured data source.Configure the job to write the data into the data lake in Apache Parquet format.
B. Create an AWS Glue extract, transform, and load (ETL) job to read from the .csv structured data source.
Configure the job to ingest the data into the data lake in JSON format.
C. Use an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in Apache Avro format.
D. Use an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in .csv format.

正解：A

解説：
Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena supports various data formats, such as CSV,JSON, ORC, Avro, and Parquet. However, not all data formats are equally efficient for querying. Some data formats, such as CSV and JSON, are row-oriented, meaning that they store data as a sequence of records, each with the same fields. Row-oriented formats are suitable for loading and exporting data, but they are not optimal for analytical queries that often access only a subset of columns. Row-oriented formats also do not support compression or encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance.
On the other hand, some data formats, such as ORC and Parquet, are column-oriented, meaning that they store data as a collection of columns, each with a specific data type. Column-oriented formats are ideal for analytical queries that often filter, aggregate, or join data by columns. Column-oriented formats also support compression and encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance. For example, Parquet supports dictionary encoding, which replaces repeated values with numeric codes, and run-length encoding, which replaces consecutive identical values with a single value and a count. Parquet also supports various compression algorithms, such as Snappy, GZIP, and ZSTD, that can further reduce the data size and improve the query performance.
Therefore, creating an AWS Glue extract, transform, and load (ETL) job to read from the .csv structured data source and writing the data into the data lake in Apache Parquet format will meet the requirements most cost-effectively. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that provides a serverless data integration platform for data preparation, data cataloging, and data loading. AWS Glue ETL jobs allow you to transform and load data from various sources into various targets, using either a graphical interface (AWS Glue Studio) or a code-based interface (AWS Glue console or AWS Glue API). By using AWS Glue ETL jobs, you can easily convert the data from CSV to Parquet format, without having to write or manage any code. Parquet is a column-oriented format that allows Athena to scan only the relevant columns and skip the rest, reducing the amount of data read from S3. This solution will also reduce the cost of Athena queries, as Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned from S3.
The other options are not as cost-effective as creating an AWS Glue ETL job to write the data into the data lake in Parquet format. Using an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in .csv format will not improve the query performance or reduce the query cost, as .csv is a row-oriented format that does not support columnar access or compression. Creating an AWS Glue ETL job to ingest the data into the data lake in JSON format will not improve the query performance or reduce the query cost, as JSON is also a row-oriented format that does not support columnar access or compression. Using an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in Apache Avro format will improve the query performance, as Avro is a column-oriented format that supports compression and encoding, but it will require more operational effort, as you will need to write and maintain PySpark code to convert the data from CSV to Avro format.
References:
Amazon Athena
Choosing the Right Data Format
AWS Glue
[AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide], Chapter 5: Data Analysis and Visualization, Section 5.1: Amazon Athena

質問 # 65
A company is building an analytics solution. The solution uses Amazon S3 for data lake storage and Amazon Redshift for a data warehouse. The company wants to use Amazon Redshift Spectrum to query the data that is in Amazon S3.
Which actions will provide the FASTEST queries? (Choose two.)

A. Use gzip compression to compress individual files to sizes that are between 1 GB and 5 GB.
B. Use a columnar storage file format.
C. Split the data into files that are less than 10 KB.
D. Use file formats that are not
E. Partition the data based on the most common query predicates.

正解：B、E

解説：
Amazon Redshift Spectrum is a feature that allows you to run SQL queries directly against data in Amazon S3, without loading or transforming the data. Redshift Spectrum can query various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, ORC, Avro, and Parquet. However, not all data formats are equally efficient for querying. Some data formats, such as CSV and JSON, are row-oriented, meaning that they store data as a sequence of records, each with the same fields. Row-oriented formats are suitable for loading and exporting data, but they are not optimal for analytical queries that often access only a subset ofcolumns. Row-oriented formats also do not support compression or encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance.
On the other hand, some data formats, such as ORC and Parquet, are column-oriented, meaning that they store data as a collection of columns, each with a specific data type. Column-oriented formats are ideal for analytical queries that often filter, aggregate, or join data by columns. Column-oriented formats also support compression and encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance. For example, Parquet supports dictionary encoding, which replaces repeated values with numeric codes, and run-length encoding, which replaces consecutive identical values with a single value and a count. Parquet also supports various compression algorithms, such as Snappy, GZIP, and ZSTD, that can further reduce the data size and improve the query performance.
Therefore, using a columnar storage file format, such as Parquet, will provide faster queries, as it allows Redshift Spectrum to scan only the relevant columns and skip the rest, reducing the amount of data read from S3. Additionally, partitioning the data based on the most common query predicates, such as date, time, region, etc., will provide faster queries, as it allows Redshift Spectrum to prune the partitions that do not match the query criteria, reducing the amount of data scanned from S3. Partitioning also improves the performance of joins and aggregations, as it reduces data skew and shuffling.
The other options are not as effective as using a columnar storage file format and partitioning the data. Using gzip compression to compress individual files to sizes that are between 1 GB and 5 GB will reduce the data size, but it will not improve the query performance significantly, as gzip is not a splittable compression algorithm and requires decompression before reading. Splitting the data into files that are less than 10 KB will increase the number of files and the metadata overhead, which will degrade the query performance. Using file formats that are not supported by Redshift Spectrum, such as XML, will not work, as Redshift Spectrum will not be able to read or parse the data. References:
Amazon Redshift Spectrum
Choosing the Right Data Format
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 4: Data Lakes and Data Warehouses, Section 4.3: Amazon Redshift Spectrum

質問 # 66
......

当社CertJukenのData-Engineer-Associate学習教材は、実際のData-Engineer-Associate試験に対する自信を高め、参加する試験の質問と回答を思い出すのに役立ちます。最も適したバージョンを選択できます。当社のData-Engineer-Associate試験トレントは、重要な情報を簡素化し、焦点を絞ってData-Engineer-Associateテストトレントを短時間で習得できるようにします。 Data-Engineer-Associate学習教材の包括的な理解を得るために、Data-Engineer-Associate試験問題のデモを無料でダウンロードする場合は、まず製品の紹介をご覧ください。

Data-Engineer-Associateトレーニング費用: https://www.certjuken.com/Data-Engineer-Associate-exam.html

また、当社のData-Engineer-Associateトレーニングガイドは、作業効率を改善し、作業をより簡単かつスムーズに行う絶好の機会です、CertJuken Data-Engineer-Associateトレーニング費用のトレーニング資料は完全だけでなく、カバー率も高くて、高度なシミュレーションを持っているのです、AmazonのData-Engineer-Associate試験問題集はCertJukenのIT領域の専門家が心を込めて研究したものですから、CertJukenのAmazonのData-Engineer-Associate試験資料を手に入れると、あなたが美しい明日を迎えることと信じています、もしお客様はData-Engineer-Associate認定試験に合格しなかったら、我々はAmazon Data-Engineer-Associate問題集の費用を全額であなたに戻り返します、Data-Engineer-Associatepdf問題集参考書があなたにもたらす信じられないほどの利益を見逃すことはできません。

自分のほうから秘密のもれるようなことは絶対にありません、浴室から戻れば寝ていたんだぞ、実都な、んで抱きしめる必要が、また、当社のData-Engineer-Associateトレーニングガイドは、作業効率を改善し、作業をより簡単かつスムーズに行う絶好の機会です。

試験の準備方法-最新のData-Engineer-Associate模擬試験試験-一番優秀なData-Engineer-Associateトレーニング費用

CertJukenのトレーニング資料は完全だけでなく、カバー率も高くて、高度なシミュレーションを持っているのです、AmazonのData-Engineer-Associate試験問題集はCertJukenのIT領域の専門家が心を込めて研究したものですから、CertJukenのAmazonのData-Engineer-Associate試験資料を手に入れると、あなたが美しい明日を迎えることと信じています。

もしお客様はData-Engineer-Associate認定試験に合格しなかったら、我々はAmazon Data-Engineer-Associate問題集の費用を全額であなたに戻り返します、Data-Engineer-Associatepdf問題集参考書があなたにもたらす信じられないほどの利益を見逃すことはできません。

P.S. CertJukenがGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいData-Engineer-Associateダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1aixICd2GA7_q-4fxTSFYNJV-ykKyQWlo